death penalty essay conclusion agree

Entertainment & Pop Culture
Geography & Travel
Health & Medicine
Lifestyles & Social Issues
Philosophy & Religion
Politics, Law & Government
Sports & Recreation
Visual Arts
World History
On This Day in History
Biographies
Top Questions
Week In Review
Infographics
Demystified
Image Galleries
One Good Fact
Britannica Explains In these videos, Britannica explains a variety of topics and answers frequently asked questions.
Britannica Classics Check out these retro videos from Encyclopedia Britannica’s archives.
#WTFact Videos In #WTFact Britannica shares some of the most bizarre facts we can find.
This Time in History In these videos, find out what happened this month (or any month!) in history.
Demystified Videos In Demystified, Britannica has all the answers to your burning questions.
Student Portal Britannica is the ultimate student resource for key school subjects like history, government, literature, and more.
COVID-19 Portal While this global health crisis continues to evolve, it can be useful to look to past pandemics to better understand how to respond today.
100 Women Britannica celebrates the centennial of the Nineteenth Amendment, highlighting suffragists and history-making politicians.
Britannica Beyond We’ve created a new place where questions are at the center of learning. Go ahead. Ask. We won’t mind.
Saving Earth Britannica Presents Earth’s To-Do List for the 21st Century. Learn about the major environmental problems facing our planet and what can be done about them!
SpaceNext50 Britannica presents SpaceNext50, From the race to the Moon to space stewardship, we explore a wide range of subjects that feed our curiosity about space!
Introduction
Historical considerations

Moral arguments

Utilitarian arguments, practical arguments, the abolition movement.

Arguments for and against capital punishment

Capital punishment has long engendered considerable debate about both its morality and its effect on criminal behaviour. Contemporary arguments for and against capital punishment fall under three general headings: moral , utilitarian, and practical.

Supporters of the death penalty believe that those who commit murder , because they have taken the life of another, have forfeited their own right to life. Furthermore, they believe, capital punishment is a just form of retribution , expressing and reinforcing the moral indignation not only of the victim’s relatives but of law-abiding citizens in general. By contrast, opponents of capital punishment, following the writings of Cesare Beccaria (in particular On Crimes and Punishments [1764]), argue that, by legitimizing the very behaviour that the law seeks to repress—killing—capital punishment is counterproductive in the moral message it conveys. Moreover, they urge, when it is used for lesser crimes, capital punishment is immoral because it is wholly disproportionate to the harm done. Abolitionists also claim that capital punishment violates the condemned person’s right to life and is fundamentally inhuman and degrading.

Although death was prescribed for crimes in many sacred religious documents and historically was practiced widely with the support of religious hierarchies , today there is no agreement among religious faiths, or among denominations or sects within them, on the morality of capital punishment. Beginning in the last half of the 20th century, increasing numbers of religious leaders—particularly within Judaism and Roman Catholicism—campaigned against it. Capital punishment was abolished by the state of Israel for all offenses except treason and crimes against humanity, and Pope John Paul II condemned it as “cruel and unnecessary.”

Supporters of capital punishment also claim that it has a uniquely potent deterrent effect on potentially violent offenders for whom the threat of imprisonment is not a sufficient restraint. Opponents, however, point to research that generally has demonstrated that the death penalty is not a more effective deterrent than the alternative sanction of life or long-term imprisonment.

There also are disputes about whether capital punishment can be administered in a manner consistent with justice . Those who support capital punishment believe that it is possible to fashion laws and procedures that ensure that only those who are really deserving of death are executed. By contrast, opponents maintain that the historical application of capital punishment shows that any attempt to single out certain kinds of crime as deserving of death will inevitably be arbitrary and discriminatory. They also point to other factors that they think preclude the possibility that capital punishment can be fairly applied, arguing that the poor and ethnic and religious minorities often do not have access to good legal assistance, that racial prejudice motivates predominantly white juries in capital cases to convict black and other nonwhite defendants in disproportionate numbers, and that, because errors are inevitable even in a well-run criminal justice system, some people will be executed for crimes they did not commit. Finally, they argue that, because the appeals process for death sentences is protracted, those condemned to death are often cruelly forced to endure long periods of uncertainty about their fate.

Under the influence of the European Enlightenment , in the latter part of the 18th century there began a movement to limit the scope of capital punishment. Until that time a very wide range of offenses, including even common theft, were punishable by death—though the punishment was not always enforced , in part because juries tended to acquit defendants against the evidence in minor cases. In 1794 the U.S. state of Pennsylvania became the first jurisdiction to restrict the death penalty to first-degree murder, and in 1846 the state of Michigan abolished capital punishment for all murders and other common crimes. In 1863 Venezuela became the first country to abolish capital punishment for all crimes, including serious offenses against the state (e.g., treason and military offenses in time of war). San Marino was the first European country to abolish the death penalty, doing so in 1865; by the early 20th century several other countries, including the Netherlands, Norway , Sweden , Denmark , and Italy , had followed suit (though it was reintroduced in Italy under the fascist regime of Benito Mussolini ). By the mid-1960s some 25 countries had abolished the death penalty for murder, though only about half of them also had abolished it for offenses against the state or the military code. For example, Britain abolished capital punishment for murder in 1965, but treason, piracy, and military crimes remained capital offenses until 1998.

During the last third of the 20th century, the number of abolitionist countries increased more than threefold. These countries, together with those that are “de facto” abolitionist—i.e., those in which capital punishment is legal but not exercised—now represent more than half the countries of the world. One reason for the significant increase in the number of abolitionist states was that the abolition movement was successful in making capital punishment an international human rights issue, whereas formerly it had been regarded as solely an internal matter for the countries concerned.

In 1971 the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution that, “in order fully to guarantee the right to life, provided for in…the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” called for restricting the number of offenses for which the death penalty could be imposed, with a view toward abolishing it altogether. This resolution was reaffirmed by the General Assembly in 1977. Optional protocols to the European Convention on Human Rights (1983) and to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1989) have been established, under which countries party to the convention and the covenant undertake not to carry out executions. The Council of Europe (1994) and the EU (1998) established as a condition of membership in their organizations the requirement that prospective member countries suspend executions and commit themselves to abolition. This decision had a remarkable impact on the countries of central and eastern Europe , prompting several of them—e.g., the Czech Republic , Hungary , Romania , Slovakia , and Slovenia—to abolish capital punishment.

In the 1990s many African countries—including Angola, Djibouti, Mozambique, and Namibia—abolished capital punishment, though most African countries retained it. In South Africa , which formerly had one of the world’s highest execution rates, capital punishment was outlawed in 1995 by the Constitutional Court, which declared that it was incompatible with the prohibition against cruel, inhuman, or degrading punishment and with “a human rights culture.”

Home / Essay Samples / Social Issues / Human Rights / Death Penalty

Argumentative Essay on Death Penalty

Essay details.

Social Issues , Law, Crime & Punishment

Human Rights , Crime Prevention & Criminal Justice , Judiciary

Death Penalty , Punishment , Types of Human Rights

Words: 1992 (4 pages)

Please note! This essay has been submitted by a student.

Get quality help now

Verified writer

Proficient in: Human Rights , Crime Prevention & Criminal Justice , Judiciary

+ 75 relevant experts are online

Death Penalty Essays

About the death penalty.

The death penalty has been a method used as far back as the Eighteenth century B.C. The use of the death penalty was for punishing people for committing relentless crimes. The severity of the punishment were much more inferior in comparison to modern day. These inferior punishments included boiling live bodies, burning at the stake, hanging, and extensive use of the guillotine to decapitate criminals. In the ancient days no laws were established to dictate and regulate the type of […]

Does the Death Penalty Effectively Deter Crime?

The death penalty in America has been effective since 1608. Throughout the years following the first execution, criminal behaviors have begun to deteriorate. Capital punishment was first formed to deter crime and treason. As a result, it increased the rate of crime, according to researchers. Punishing criminals by death does not effectively deter crime because criminals are not concerned with consequences, apprehension, and judges are not willing to pay the expenses. During the stage of mens rea, thoughts of committing […]

The Death Penalty should not be Legal

Imagine you hit your sibling and your mom hits you back to teach that you shouldn’t be hitting anyone. Do you really learn not to be violent from that or instead do you learn how it is okay for moms or dads to hit their children in order to teach them something? This is exactly how the death penalty works. The death penalty has been a form of punishment for decades. There are several methods of execution and those are […]

Death Penalty should be Abolished

What jurisdiction does the law have over one’s life? The United states was founded on the rights of life, liberty, and property. Death Penalty also known as capital punishment is a form of punishment in which a criminal is put to death because of his or her action in murder. The denial of life that is capital punishment is conflicting to what the United States was founded on. The death penalty is currently legal in 30 states and illegal or […]

Stephen Nathanson’s “An Eye for an Eye”

According to Stephen Nathanson’s “An Eye for an Eye?”, he believes that capital punishment should be immediately abolished and that the principle of punishment, “lex talionis” which correlates to the classic saying “an eye for an eye” is not a valid reason for issuing the death penalty in any country, thus, abolishment of Capital Punishment should follow. Throughout the excerpt from his book, Nathanson argues against this principle believing that one, it forces us to “commit highly immoral actions”raping a […]

We will write an essay sample crafted to your needs.

Death Penalty and Justice

By now, many of us are familiar with the statement, “an eye for an eye,” which came from the bible, so it should be followed as holy writ. Then there was Gandhi, who inspired thousands and said, “an eye for an eye will leave us all blind.” This begs the question, which option do we pick to be a good moral agent, in the terms of justice that is. Some states in America practice the death penalty, where some states […]

Pro Death Penalty

I concur the death penalty is perfect to apply in the equity community. The death penalty is a definitive discipline our general public can give one for their activities and it not all way awful. Then again it is viewed as a disavowal of human rights that advances more prominent savagery in our general public. Strict Resilience. Research shows the Organization expresses that inside the US, more than 13,000 individuals were lawfully finished since pioneer times. Strict Resilience Is the […]

Is the Death Penalty Morally Right?

There have been several disputes on whether the death penalty is morally right. Considering the ethical issues with this punishment can help distinguish if it should be denied or accepted. For example, it can be argued that a criminal of extreme offenses should be granted the same level of penance as their crime. During the duration of their sentencing they could repent on their actions and desire another opportunity of freedom. The death penalty should be outlawed because of too […]

Death Penalty is Immoral

Let’s say your child grabs a plate purposely. You see them grab the plate, smash it on the ground and look you straight in the eyes. Are they deserving of a punishment? Now what if I say your child is three years old. A three year old typically doesn’t know they have done something wrong. But since your child broke that one plate, your kid is being put on death row. You may be thinking, that is too harsh of […]

Religious Values and Death Penalty

Religious and moral values tell us that killing is wrong. Thou shall not kill. To me, the death penalty is inhumane. Killing people makes us like the murderers that most of us despise. No imperfect system should have the right to decide who lives and who dies. The government is made up of imperfect humans, who make mistakes. The only person that should be able to take life, is god. “An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind”. […]

Is the Death Penalty “Humane”

What’s the first thing that pops up in your mind when you hear the words Capital Punishment? I’m assuming for most people the first thing that pops up is a criminal sitting on a chair, with all limbs tied down, and some type of mechanism connected to their head. Even though this really isn’t the way that it is done, I do not blame people for imagining that type of image because that is how movies usually portray capital punishment. […]

Ineffectiveness of Death Penalty

Death penalty as a means of punishing crime and discouraging wrong behaviour has suffered opposition from various fronts. Religious leaders argue that it is morally wrong to take someone’s life while liberal thinkers claim that there are better ways to punish wrong behaviour other than the death penalty. This debate rages on while statistically, Texas executes more individuals than any other state in the United States of America. America itself also has the highest number of death penalty related deaths […]

The Debate of the Death Penalty

Capital punishment is a moral issue that is often scrutinized due to the taking of someone’s life. This is in large part because of the views many have toward the rule of law or an acceptance to the status quo. In order to get a true scope of the death penalty, it is best to address potential biases from a particular ethical viewpoint. By looking at it from several theories of punishment, selecting the most viable theory makes it a […]

The Controversy of Death Penalty

The death penalty is a very controversial topic in many states. Although the idea of the death penalty does sound terrifying, would you really want a murderer to be given food and shelter for free? Would you want a murderer to get out of jail and still end up killing another innocent person? Imagine if that murder gets out of jail and kills someone in your family; Wouldn’t you want that murderer to be killed as well? Murderers can kill […]

Cost of the Death Penalty

The death penalty costs more than life in prison. According to Fox News correspondent Dan Springer, the State of California spent 4 billion dollars to execute 13 individuals, in addition to the net spend of an estimated $64,000 per prisoner every year. Springer (2011) documents how the death penalty convictions declined due to economic reasons. The state spends up to 3 times more when seeking a death penalty than when pursuing a life in prison without the possibility of parole. […]

The Solution to the Death Penalty

There was not a time where there weren’t any criminals killing, stealing, exploiting people, and even selling illegal items in the United States of America. Of course, America will not tolerate the crimes done by those who believe they are above the law. Once the convicts are caught they are taken into justice. In the past, these criminals are often faced with a punishment that meets their end. That punishment would be the death penalty. Those in the past had […]

Why the Death Penalty is Unjust

Capital punishment being either a justifiable law, or a horrendous, unjust act can be determined based on the perspective of different worldviews. In a traditional Christian perspective, the word of God given to the world in The Holy Bible should only be abided by. The Holy Bible states that no man (or woman) should shed the blood of another man (or woman). Christians are taught to teach a greater amount of sacrifice for the sake of the Lord. Social justice […]

Costs: Death Penalty Versus Prison Costs

The Conservatives Concerned Organization challenges the notion that the death penalty is more cost effective compared to prison housing and feeding costs. The organization argues that the death penalty is an expensive lengthy and complicated process concluding that it is not only a bloated program that delays justice and bogs down the enforcement of the law, it is also an inefficient justice process that diverts financial resources from law enforcement programs that could protect individuals and save lives. According to […]

Should the Death Penalty be Legal in all Fifty States?

The death penalty dates back to the eighteenth century which was for 25 specific crimes. The first recorded American death due to the death penalty was a spy for Spain in 1608 located in Jamestown Virginia(DPIC). In, 1612 the Virginia governor opened up the death penalty for minor crimes such as stealing grapes(DPIC). In, 1684 Michigan became the first state to abolish the death penalty and many states and countries followed behind. During, the 1960s it was brought to the […]

Euthanasia and Death Penalty

Euthanasia and death penalty are two controversy topics, that get a lot of attention in today’s life. The subject itself has the roots deep in the beginning of the humankind. It is interesting and maybe useful to learn the answer and if there is right or wrong in those actions. The decision if a person should live or die depends on the state laws. There are both opponents and supporters of the subject. However different the opinions are, the state […]

Death Penalty as a Source of Constant Controversy

The death penalty has been a source of almost constant controversy for hundreds of years, splitting the population down the middle with people supporting the death penalty and people that think it is unnecessary. The amount of people that are been against the death penalty has grown in recent years, causing the amount of executions to dwindle down to where there is less than one hundred every year. This number will continue to lessen as more and more people decide […]

About Carlton Franklin

In most other situations, the long-unsolved Westfield Murder would have been a death penalty case. A 57-year-old legal secretary, Lena Triano, was found tied up, raped, beaten, and stabbed in her New Jersey home. A DNA sample from her undergarments connected Carlton Franklin to the scene of the crime. However, fortunately enough for Franklin, he was not convicted until almost four decades after the murder and, in an unusual turn of events, was tried in juvenile court. Franklin was fifteen […]

Effectively Solving Society’s Criminality

Has one ever wondered if the person standing or sitting next to them has the potential to be a murderer or a rapist? What do those who are victimized personally or have suffered from a tragic event involving a loved-one or someone near and dear to their heart, expect from the government? Convicted felons of this nature and degree of unlawfulness should be sentenced to death. Psychotic killers and rapists need the ultimate consequences such as the death penalty for […]

The Death Penalty and People’s Opinions

The death penalty is a highly debated topic that often divided opinion amongst people all around the world. Firstly, let’s take a look at our capital punishments, with certain crimes, come different serving times. Most crimes include treason, espionage, murder, large-scale drug trafficking, and murder towards a juror, witness, or a court officer in some cases. These are a few examples compared to the forty-one federal capital offenses to date. Our writers can help you with any type of essay. […]

Punishment and the Nature of the Crime

When an individual commits a crime then he/she is given punishment depending on the nature of the crime committed. The US’s way of giving punishment to an offender has been criticized for many years. There are 2 types of cases; civil and criminal cases. In civil cases, most of the verdict comprises of jail time or fine amount to be paid. These are not as severe except the one related to money laundering and forgery. On the other hand, criminal […]

George Walker Bush and Death Penalty

George Walker Bush, a former U.S. president, and governor of Texas, once spoke, “I don’t think you should support the death penalty to seek revenge. I don’t think that’s right. I think the reason to support the death penalty is because it saves other people’s lives.” The death penalty, or capital punishment, refers to the execution of a criminal convicted of a capital offense. With many criminals awaiting execution on death row, the death penalty has been a debated topic […]

The Death Penalty and Juveniles

Introduction: In today’s society, many juveniles are being sent to trial without having the chance of getting a fair trial as anyone else would. Many citizens would see juveniles as dangerous individuals, but in my opinion how a teenager acts at home starts at home. Punishing a child for something that could have been solved at home is something that should not have to get worse by giving them the death penalty. The death penalty should not be imposed on […]

Death Penalty is Politically Just?

Being wrongfully accused is unimaginable, but think if you were wrongfully accused and the ultimate punishment was death. Death penalty is one of the most controversial issues in today’s society, but what is politically just? When a crime is committed most assume that the only acceptable consequence is to be put to death rather than thinking of another form of punishment. Religiously the death penalty is unfair because the, “USCCB concludes prisoners can change and find redemption through ministry outreach, […]

The Death Penalty: Right or Wrong?

The death penalty has been a controversial topic throughout the years and now more than ever, as we argue; Right or Wrong? Moral or Immoral? Constitutional or Unconstitutional? The death penalty also known as capital punishment is a legal process where the state justice sentences an individual to be executed as punishment for a crime committed. The death penalty sentence strongly depends on the severity of the crime, in the US there are 41 crimes that can lead to being […]

The Death Penalty is not Worth the Cost

The death penalty is a government practice, used as a punishment for capital crimes such as treason, murder, and genocide to name a few. It has been a controversial topic for many years some countries still use it while others don’t. In the United States, each state gets to choose whether they consider it to be legal or not. Which is why in this country 30 states allow it while 20 states have gotten rid of it. It is controversial […]

Death Penalty Essay: Argumentative Essay Sample

Can the Death Penalty Be Effective?

There are numerous debates about the death penalty, as the opinions on this topic differ in different countries of the world. Most countries have abolished the death penalty, but there are still countries where it is used. The effectiveness of the death penalty can be measured by the rates of crimes that demonstrate that this method of punishment does not reduce the number of criminal acts.

The main goal of the death penalty is to decrease the numbers of abhorrent crimes in the world. However, the statistics show that it does not have as many positive effects as expected. For instance, among the 25 states of the US with the highest crime rates, the death penalty is legal in 20 of them (Tures). If the death penalty was an effective method for the prevention and decrease of crime, the statistics would demonstrate that states with the death penalty would have lower crime rates. Conversely, the statistics show the opposite result, which means that it does not have high effectiveness. Today, capital punishment most likely has other goals, such as revenge. It violates human rights, which is why a growing number of people are against this type of punishment.

There is no evidence that the death penalty is effective for the prevention of criminal acts. However, it is proven that there are numerous disadvantages when it comes to this type of punishment. For instance, there is always a possibility that the person who is punished by death penalty is innocent. The statistics demonstrate that in 2017 there were 137 prison inmates released because of their innocence (Sampathkumar). There is no statistical data about the number of people killed as a result of their criminal acts, but there is the possibility that an innocent person can become the victim of the death penalty. There is information that 4% of people executed by death penalty are innocent, and therefore, it is essential to abolish this type of punishment in all countries of the world in order to prevent the cases of killing innocent people (Goodman). Also, the death penalty is a problem which costs money for the country. For example, the average cost of this case is almost $2.5 million (Goodman). The money spent on the death penalty could have been used for more important goals, such as saving the lives of other people and helping homeless and disabled children. Also, the death penalty has a negative effect on African American culture. For instance, African Americans make up around 13% of the population in the US, but the percentage of death row prisoners who are black is around 50 (Goodman). It demonstrates that there is a higher possibility for a black person to be executed than for a white person. These disadvantages should be the motivation for governments of all countries to make the death penalty illegal.

The death penalty is one of the cruelest types of criminal punishment, which is performed with the help of different methods such as hanging, electrocution, and lethal injections. It would be possible to say that the death penalty is an effective method of prevention of abhorrent crimes if the statistics showed that it decreased the number of criminal acts. However, there is no evidence of the effectiveness of this type of punishment, and yet there are numerous disadvantages to this process.

Works Cited

Goodman, Paul. “The Pros and Cons of the Death Penalty.” Soapboxie , 2018, https://soapboxie.com/government/Death-Penalty-Pros-and-Cons. Sampathkumar, Mythili. “Record Number of Innocent Prison Inmates Released Last Year Over Misconduct by Police, Prosecutors or Government Officials.” The Independent , 2018, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/prison-innocent-police-misconduct-prosecutors-inmates-released-exonerations-2017-a8256521.html. Tures, John. “Does the Death Penalty Reduce the Murder Rate?” Huffpost , 2017, https://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-a-tures/does-the-death-penalty-re_b_13362760.html.

Death Penalty Essay Writing Assistance from Pro Writers

As you can see, the author of the argumentative essay about the death penalty above considers capital punishment to be an irrational and useless tool of the justice system. The death penalty doesn’t have any impact on the number of crimes and causes serious legal and moral issues. And what do you think? Leave your thoughts in the comments and express your opinion on this important topic.

This death penalty essay isn’t the only helpful thing that you can find on our blog. We have many writing guides and tips, informative samples from our expert authors, and impressive lists of topics for your essays and research papers. By the way, we recommend you to check the list of death penalty research paper topics and to pick one topic for your own argumentative paper.

If you don’t feel inspired enough to deal with your argumentative essay by yourself – we offer you an excellent alternative – essay writing help . Apply to our professional writers, and they will provide you with a well-structured and original sample at an affordable price. If you don’t find a good topic for your essay in our blog articles, you’re welcome to use our topic suggestion tool.

Place your order now and take advantage of all of our fantastic benefits now!

Photo by 8385 from Pixabay

The Death Penalty Essay, with Outline

Published by gudwriter on May 24, 2018 May 24, 2018

Ready for a death penalty essay? Take a look at this informational resource featuring an outline, APA style format and a list of references.

Are your assignments troubling you?

Get your troublesome papers finished by our competent writers now!

Special offer! Get 20% discount on your first order. Promo code: SAVE20

Most students will agree that there are certain periods that they find much more interesting than others. What you really need is a history homework helper with immeasurable knowledge on this type of essays. Here is an example of a sample of death penalty.

Death Penalty Essay Outline

Introduction.

Thesis: The death penalty should be abolished because it is not one of the best methods of punishing criminals and addressing crime.

Paragraph 1:

Capital punishment is not an effective way of deterring crime contrary to arguments of those who support it.

Paragraph 2:

The penalty is not in order because there is no humane way to kill.

Paragraph 3:

The penalty makes a public spectacle out of the death of an individual.

Paragraph 4:

The penalty does not apply fairly to all criminals as some people are left sentenced to death due to poor quality defense.

Paragraph 5:

The death penalty cannot be taken back once it is executed.

Paragraph 6:

Capital punishment is also overly controversial in terms of its ethicality and morality, in light of the Consequentialist Ethical Framework.

The death penalty does not address crime effectively as it is purported to. Instead, it tramples upon the human right of undergoing a dignified death and dying peacefully and out of public’s attention.

The Death Penalty Essay Example

The death penalty is one criminal justice area that has attracted a serious debate about whether or not it should be abolished. The penalty enjoys a strong support from the public as people believe that it serves to deter crime as criminals are afraid of dying just like other humans. However, those opposed to it believe that there are enough reasons to warrant its abolishment. For instance, they argue that it does not deter crime as it does not address what motivates people to act criminally. This paper argues that the death penalty should be abolished because it is not one of the best methods of punishing criminals and addressing crime.

Capital punishment is not an effective way of deterring crime contrary to arguments of those who support it. This is because it lacks the deterrent effect to which its advocates commonly refer. “As recently stated by the General Assembly of the United Nations, “there is no conclusive evidence of the deterrent value of the death penalty”” (International Commission against Death Penalty, 2013). This is why a continuously increasing number of law professionals are seriously questioning the effectiveness of the penalty in preventing crime. It is wrongly assumed that one would not want to commit crime since it would possibly land them into the capital punishment. There is however no evidence to support this assumption. Even if one was to fear dying as is assumed here, they might choose to engage in crime that does not attract the death penalty.

The penalty is also not in order because there is no humane way to kill. In 2006 for instance, a lethal injection that was used to execute Angel Nieves Diaz and was deemed ‘humane’ took a whopping 34 minutes and was administered in two doses (Amnesty International Australia, 2018). According to doctors’ opinion on the case, it is likely that Diaz underwent a painful death and thus the procedure could not have been humane in any way. Other brutal execution methods used across the globe include beheading, shooting, and hanging. The nature of these deaths is such that they only continue to perpetuate the violence cycle. In addition, they add onto the pain the victims’ family would have already suffered upon a member of theirs being taken into custody.

Further, the penalty makes a public spectacle out of the death of an individual. Victims are often executed in a manner that is extremely public, with lethal injections live broadcasts in the United States or public hangings in Iran. UN human rights experts hold that there is no legitimate purpose served by public executions which according them, only increase the punishment’s degrading, inhuman, and cruel nature. According to Hadj Sahraoui, an Amnesty International official , executions “carried out publicly are a gross affront to human dignity which cannot be tolerated” (Amnesty International Australia, 2018). Normally, a human being should be allowed the right to die in a dignified manner and ‘privately’ so they may have peace during the transition. It is a right that not even law should take away.

Contrary to the death penalty proponents’ argument that it applies fairly to all criminals, this is not the case as some people are left sentenced to death due to poor quality defense. As observed by OADP (2018), ineffective assistance of counsel is one of the factors that frequently cause reversals in death penalty cases. “Columbia University found that 68% of all death penalty cases were reversed on appeal, with inadequate defense as one of the main reasons requiring reversal” (OADP, 2018). Thus, it follows that whether or not one gets the death sentence largely lies in their ability to afford high quality defense. This makes this punishment method unfair.

Further, the death penalty cannot be taken back once it is executed. People may end up paying for crimes they never committed are a result of absolute judgments. “Texas man Cameron Todd Willingham was executed in Texas in 2004 for allegedly setting a fire that killed his three daughters” (Amnesty International Australia, 2018). However, it would later be revealed through evidence that he was not the one who set that fire. Mr. Willingham, an innocent citizen, had paid with his life a crime he never knew anything about nor committed. As is clear here, being declared innocent was of no use for him since it could not bring him back to life. As such, criminal justice systems should apply punishment methods that allow for the setting free of individuals should further evidence prove them innocent after they are punished.

Capital punishment is also overly controversial in terms of its ethicality and morality, in light of the Consequentialist Ethical Framework. As per this framework, an action passes the ethical test only if it yields the best consequences for everyone (Bonde, et al., 2013). The results of such an action should be such that those involved get the most good out of it. From the onset, it is the intent of any person using this framework to achieve results that would benefit all the people entangled in an ethical dilemma or issue. The framework is advantageous in the sense that it pragmatically focuses on the results of an action before the action is performed. It ensures nobody is treated unfairly in the aftermath of the action. In capital punishment, a person is killed with the apparent hope that his or her death will serve justice to the offended. From the Consequentialist Ethical Framework angle, this may not be the case.

The death penalty does not address crime effectively as it is purported to, and is also unethical. Instead, it tramples upon the human right of undergoing a dignified death and dying peacefully and out of public’s attention. There can never be a humane way to kill and no matter the crime one has committed, they should not be subjected to this painful process of dying. The punishment is also not fair as some people might while others might not afford to hire quality lawyers to defend them. Moreover, it cannot be taken back and this means once persecuted, one can never regain their innocence as well as their life.

Amnesty International Australia. (2018). “Five reasons to abolish the death penalty”. Amnesty International Australia . Retrieved May 20, 2018 from https://www.amnesty.org.au/5-reasons-abolish-death-penalty/#

Bonde, S., et al. (2013). “A framework for making ethical decisions”. Brow University . Retrieved July 3, 2020 from https://www.brown.edu/academics/science-and-technology-studies/framework-making-ethical-decisions .

International Commission against death penalty. (2013). “Why the death penalty should be abolished”. International Commission against Death Penalty . Retrieved May 20, 2018 from http://www.icomdp.org/arguments-against-the-death-penalty/

OADP. (2018). “The facts: 13 reasons to oppose the death penalty”. Oregonians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty . Retrieved May 20, 2018 from https://oadp.org/facts/13-reasons

Learn how to get your essay done fast and better. Ensure your final paper is well edited, structured and is plagiarism free by using the best writing tools .

Free essays and research papers, synthesis essay example – with outline.

The goal of a synthesis paper is to show that you can handle in-depth research, dissect complex ideas, and present the arguments. Most college or university students have a hard time writing a synthesis essay, Read more…

Examples of Spatial Order – With Outline

A spatial order is an organizational style that helps in the presentation of ideas or things as is in their locations. Most students struggle to understand the meaning of spatial order in writing and have Read more…

Ad Analysis Essay Example With Outline

An ad analysis essay is a type of academic essay whereby the writer is required to examine an advertisement. The aim of the essay is to find any hidden messages which may be deceptive or misleading Read more…

StudyDriver in your Smartphone!

Essay ‘Agree or Disagree with the Death Penalty?’

“Essay ‘Agree or Disagree with the Death Penalty?’”

When watching the video of Todd Willingham, I feel that I am for the death penalty if murder was the reason for it. I feel that a death penalty should be placed on a person if they took the lives of innocent people/person for no reason. The reason I am for the death penalty is because if someone murders someone else, they have given up their human rights, including the one to stay alive themselves. Another reason is that the punishment should ‘fit the crime’ because if you have killed someone, you should be killed too. Lastly, giving a killer the death sentence will stop them and others from doing it again. However, evidence should always come into place because the court doesn’t want to mistakenly execute an innocent person for the crime he/she didn’t commit.

Political debates about the death penalty in Texas has become an ongoing issue for quite sometime now. My opinion on capital punishment is of course going to be different from others and that’s alright. The short film about Todd Willingham’s execution has changed my opinion on the death penalty because at first I was against it. I felt that an execution of someone sometimes causes a painful death because it’s either they are being killed by a lethal injection, or being electrocuted. I also felt that no one has ever proven with numbers that the death penalty stopped other people from committing similar crimes. I later realized while watching the short film that if you do the crime, punishment will come into place no matter what. It is always a person’s decision if they want to kill or harm others for no reason at all. Murderers put this upon themselves and it’s too easy to avoid. Intentionally deciding to kill and harm others is a choice, therefore, legal actions will happen. Nonetheless, watching the video about Todd Willingham really changed my perspective of the death penalty in Texas, and it really opened my eyes about the law on capital punishment.

Cite this page

Essay 'Agree Or Disagree With The Death Penalty?'. (2021, May 10). Retrieved from https://studydriver.com/essay-agree-or-disagree-with-the-death-penalty/

"Essay 'Agree Or Disagree With The Death Penalty?'." StudyDriver.com , 10 May 2021, https://studydriver.com/essay-agree-or-disagree-with-the-death-penalty/

StudyDriver.com. (2021). Essay 'Agree Or Disagree With The Death Penalty?' . [Online]. Available at: https://studydriver.com/essay-agree-or-disagree-with-the-death-penalty/ [Accessed: 13 Mar. 2023]

"Essay 'Agree Or Disagree With The Death Penalty?'." StudyDriver.com, May 10, 2021. Accessed March 13, 2023. https://studydriver.com/essay-agree-or-disagree-with-the-death-penalty/

"Essay 'Agree Or Disagree With The Death Penalty?'," StudyDriver.com , 10-May-2021. [Online]. Available: https://studydriver.com/essay-agree-or-disagree-with-the-death-penalty/ . [Accessed: 13-Mar-2023]

StudyDriver.com. (2021). Essay 'Agree Or Disagree With The Death Penalty?' . [Online]. Available at: https://studydriver.com/essay-agree-or-disagree-with-the-death-penalty/ [Accessed: 13-Mar-2023]

Essay 'Agree Or Disagree With The Death Penalty?'. (2021, May 10). Retrieved March 13, 2023 , from https://studydriver.com/essay-agree-or-disagree-with-the-death-penalty/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Stuck on ideas? Struggling with a concept?

A professional writer will make a clear, mistake-free paper for you!

Leave your email and we will send a sample to you.

Please check your inbox

Interested in this topic?

Please indicate where to send you the sample.

Hi! I'm Chatbot Amy :)

I can help you save hours on your homework. Let's start by finding a writer.

"Conclusions about death penalty" Essays and Research Papers

Death Penalty

The death penalty has been a controversial issue for many years. It was established centuries ago and has been accepted by society. It was put into place to punish those who had committed an offense against laws of the institution that was in place at the time. Within our society the death penalty has been associated with several symbols. ‘An eye for an eye‚’ is a symbol that has come to be the representation of the death penalty ; which was one of the original ideas behind it. Times have changed

Premium Capital punishment Crime Murder

| 5. TRANSITION | 7 | 6. ARGUMENTS | 8 - 10 | 7. CONCLUSION | 11 | 8. REFERENCES | 12 - 13 | 9. BIBLIOGRAPHY | 14 - 15 | 10. APPENDIX | 16 | 1. ABSTRACT: This essay was mainly about death penalty . The information of essay was partially taken from the internet‚ through discussion among tutor and friends as well as general knowledge from outside sources. The objective of carrying out death penalty is to show that justice for extreme crime still exists. Electrocution

Premium Human rights Capital punishment Crime

DEATH PENALTY 1 ESL 151 12/12/2012 2 Committed crimes that can carry to the death penalty are known as capital crimes. Different kinds of crimes can be punished by the death penalty ‚ such as rape‚ incest‚ murder

Death penalty

Tigidankay Timbo April 6‚ 2014 English 101 Professor Cooke Report Draft#2 Should the death penalty be treated as a punishment to violent criminals? “Punishments are imposed on persons‚ not on…economic groups. Guilt is personal. The only relevant question is: does the person to be executed deserve the punishment? Whether or not others deserved the same punishment‚ whatever the economic or racial group‚ have avoided execution is irrelevant.” (ProCon.org)”. I am interested in t

Premium Capital punishment Crime Capital punishment in the United States

Death penalty : A good example to protest serious crime Kamrul Islam ID: 0920398030 May 05‚ 2013 Abstract In recent times‚ Death Penalty has increased in our country. Government has established this rules regarding death penalty in order to control the crimes that has gone out of hand. Capital punishment plays significant‚ non-emotional role in Bengali social and political culture. I suggest that the death penalty becomes an unproblematic‚ indeed‚ preferred method and symbol of justice in

Premium Capital punishment Murder Crime

believe that death penalty is a violation of human rights. I. Living as a human right like freedom of speech‚ belief and so on II. Unfair application of death penalty III. Death penalty not a more effective deterrent than imprisonment as suggested by supporters of the application Conclusion Onur Aydın Research and Writing Process Throughout history‚ people have been fighting against crime and been looking for a way to cope with it. Death penalty is one of the

Free Capital punishment Human rights Crime

Paper #3 10/30/2012 Professor Lincoln Passmore (MWR 9:15-10:20) The death penalty is a topic of much controversy in the modern world both on a personal level and a geopolitical level. There are many arguments for and against it but I feel that‚ though many people may and will disagree with me‚ there is a black and white correct answer‚ which I will discuss at the conclusion of this paper. Through history the death penalty has taken many incarnations: the gallows‚ the gas chamber‚ the firing squad

Premium Capital punishment Crime Amnesty International

Death penalty The Death Penalty has been a part of human society and its legal system for centuries‚ regarded as a necessary defense to dangerous crimes and a way to liberate the community from dangerous criminals. However‚ later on this type of punishment came to be regarded as a crime against humanistic ideals by many‚ and its validity in the legal system has been questioned. Today‚ the debate rages on. There have been at least 349 people wrongly convicted of crimes punishable by death since

taught a lesson‚ and they can stop committing crimes. There are many different ways of punishing criminals: one is the death penalty . The issue of the death penalty has been avidly discussed throughout history. Some people support the idea of the death penalty ‚ since they say it is only fair for one to forfeit their life if they take the life of another. Others feel that the death penalty is not fair‚ and fear that many innocents have been penalized for something they did not do. The issue of capital

Premium Capital punishment Crime

punished criminals by executing them‚ but today many countries have abolished the death penalty . In the United States however‚ the federal government and many of the states continue to sentence convicted criminals to death . This leads us to the question: Should the government have the power to sentence convicted criminals to death ? Before we approach this question lets take a look at the history of the death penalty and other factors that could affect the answer to this question. Although the first

Premium Capital punishment

A Persuasive paper about and for the death penalty.

The idea of your life for a life; the vast majority of our population is in favor of the death penalty . For thousands of years it has been used as a punishment for crimes. Through government for crimes against the State to churches for crimes against their religions‚ "Impositions of the death penalty is extraordinarily rare. Since 1967 there has been one execution for every 1600 murders or 0.06%. There have been approximately 560‚000 murders and 358 executions from 1967-1996." (UCR) As we continue

Premium Murder Capital punishment Prison

The Death Penalty

2011 Project Three Death Penalty Watch a man sit on a gurney and “humanely” die. The first chemical closes his eyes and puts him in a deep sleep‚ while the following injections stop him from breathing‚ and his heart from pumping. This is legal murder. Is the purpose of the death penalty to remove from society someone who would cause more harm? Is the purpose to remove from society someone who is incapable of rehabilitation? Is the purpose of the death penalty to discourage others from committing

Premium Murder Capital punishment Capital punishment in the United States

The Death Penalty Haylen Carlisle Poland Seminary High School Author Note This paper was prepared for Government‚ Period 1‚ taught by Mr. Skinner. Abstract Capital punishment is the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime. The legal killing of people convicted of crime is morally unjust and wrong. The use of the death penalty does not‚ in actuality‚ deter crimes being committed. There are innocent people being put to death which cannot be taken back once proven

Penalty of Death

The Penalty of Death The death penalty is very much one of society’s necessary evils‚ one that can never be clear cut or completely supported. Since the beginning of time‚ the words “an eye for an eye” have been taught to us‚ most of us since childhood. One has to think‚ if that philosophy was good enough for God‚ it has to be good enough for us all‚ right? Is that a fair statement in today’s society? In writing this article‚ Mencken voiced his opinions on many aspects of the death

Premium Rhetoric Ethos Death penalty

In Britain it is illegal for anyone to face a pentalys as serious as serious as death for commiting a crime however whether this is a good or bad thing may people are still unsure. Murder is wrong‚ sinful‚ and awful. Since childhood we have been taught this undeniable truth. Ask yourself‚ then‚ what is the death penalty ? In its simplest form‚ the death penalty is one person taking the life of another. Coincidentally‚ that is the definition of murder. We cannot teach killing is wrong by killing

Hammons Ethics 18 July 2013 Death Penalty Abstract Death Penalty ‚ also known as capital punishment‚ refers to an execution based on the legal powers to end a criminal’s life. It is the severest penalty in the world‚ which was widely accepted in the past. However‚ with the development of social civilization in our modern life‚ the majority of countries have begun to abolish capital punishment including some states of the United States. Whereas China still retains the death penalty for murder and other serious

OUTLINE THESIS: Is the death penalty right or wrong? Advocates for the death penalty and abolitionist against the death penalty have debated this issue since the inception of capital punishment. Advocates supporting foundation for the death penalty is that it is deterrence because it prevents future murders; and that in the death penalty serves as retribution because in a just society‚ if someone takes a life then they should give their life. Abolitionist is against the death penalty because they feel

Introduction: Death penalty has been an inalienable part of human society and its legal system for centuries‚ regarded as a necessary deterrent to dangerous crimes and a way to liberate the community from dangerous criminals. However‚ later on this type of punishment came to be regarded as a crime against humanistic ideals by many‚ and its validity in the legal system has been questioned. Until now‚ the debate rages on. But I’m here to tell you that the death penalty is the right thing to do !!

Tuesday August 7th‚ 2007‚ the criminal court of Texas had made its final decision and the green light for the execution of Foster had been given. A man who was 80 feet away from the scene of the crime. However‚ he had been sentenced to death because one of the men in his car had decided to kill a white man named Michael LaHood. Foster was scheduled to die by lethal injection on August 30th‚ 2007. He was now at the mercy of the Texas Board of Pardons and Parole‚ needing five

Premium Capital punishment Crime Prison

The Penalty of Death

instead to convey a message. What do you plan to accomplish with this essay? What do you hope the reader takes away from this argument? In this article‚ H.L. Mencken portrays his message with the intent to give prisoners that were sentenced to the death penalty an option of an appeal. He references that in the old days‚ you were sentenced and it was immediately carried out by hanging or beheading. Although he makes this statement‚ he also says it’s cruel to leave a prisoner waiting to die. 2) What did

Premium Capital punishment Writing Death row

Death Penalty Essay

Disclaimer: This paper has been submitted by a student. This is not a sample of the work written by professional academic writers.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of StudySaurus.

Argumentative Essay on Against the Death Penalty

In the United States criminal justice system when a human being takes the life of another human being there are roughly two options for consequences; Life in prison with no possibility of parole or the death penalty. So, in regard to the death penalty, morality can define what justice may to be in a criminal punishment. Individuals who believe it is morally right to put an individual to death over a horrendous crime support the retentionist argument for the death penalty. Individuals who believe it is morally wrong to kill an individual, despite the crime committed are in support of the abolitionist argument of the death penalty. In the United States, there are thirty-one states in support of the death penalty and remaining nineteen states are against the death penalty law. As the death penalty can be a controversial topic is it important to consider all possible factors. The best approach to the death penalty is the principle of human dignity.

The principle of human dignity is an argument in abolishing the death penalty. The principle of human dignity presents an argument that gives all individuals equal rights regardless of decisions made in a criminal act. The principle of human dignity is an argument that a human being, in virtue of just being a human or person has intrinsic worth. This argument means that a human being is a human being and should always be treated as one. No matter the crime committed, one does not forfeit their right to life even if they have taken one. This argument in abolishing the death penalty can agree with tortures should not be tortured, drunk drivers not being hit with a vehicle, and individuals who are accused of arson should not be set on fire. The consequences for those crimes are excessive; the same thing occurs when in regards of the death penalty. When placing the idea of an eye for an eye on various crimes is seems extreme and unnecessary. A life for a life is excessive. Criminals do forfeit some rights to life, but not all rights to life. Punishments will happen for individuals committing these crimes, but there are punishments that fit the crimes being committed. For example, life in prison with no possibility of parole fits the punishment of first degree murder.

The principle of human dignity directly goes directly against the element of reciprocity. The element of reciprocity explains that we can forfeit our rights by our own actions. If a person violates someone’s right to life, this murderer forfeits his or her right to life. The argument claims the state is not taking anyone’s right away because if one took a life of someone else, they do not have a right themselves. The human dignity argument has the idea that human dignity should always be reserved. Human rights are given to an individual when born should be modified when committing crimes but never forfeited.

The principle of human dignity attempts to portray a message to lead individuals to believe that ending someone’s life says, a person doesn’t have any worth or value left. Individuals should never lose their respect for human dignity. Good or bad actions, all humans have emotions and can feel pain; at somewhat the same level. Individuals who do not agree with the principle of human dignity are in support of the death penalty. There are many factors that morality support the death penalty. Supports are in favor of taking the life of someone who committed a horrendous crime; a life for a life. Individuals who do not agree with the human dignity argument may attempt to argue that the death penalty is an effective consequence because it deters other criminals from committing the crimes. Continuing, it may be argued that the death penalty can show society its moral outrage at unpleasant crimes. Resulting in a decrease in the crime rates. Although this seems efficient, an individual who commits a crime already knowing the consequences. Life in prison with no possible chance of parole is enough to deter an individual of a crime who does not want to seek punishment.

Other supporters of the death penalty derive more from government than society. The government is considerably more in favor of the death penalty because of the costs. It is much cheaper in today’s economy to eliminate the criminals with the death penalty rather than to pay for them to live their entire life in prison. This argument is important to the government because it saves the government more money. Rather than having an inmate in prison and maintain the funds to support these prisoner’s lives, the government would rather choose to execute the criminals. Morally, this is the most incorrect argument regarding the death penalty. No amount of money is equivalent to the life of a human being. Not only is the death penalty decreasing the value of a human being’s life, it is putting the cost and expenses of keeping individuals alive, above their rights to life.

The death penalty is the wrong consequence more many reasons. Although, individuals are rarely put to death for crimes they did not commit, it does happen. To avoid wrongfully killing an individual for a crime they did not commit, the death penalty should not be used a punishment. Technology continues to advance every day. Scientist are figuring out new technology and experiments as we speak. If new advances in technology (regarding the criminal justice system) were to be discovered and the death penalty was not implemented, an individual would gain their rights and freedom back. A wrongfully committed individual can be released from prison, not brought back to life. Not all, but some crimes can be justified.

Although the death penalty has been used for thousands of years to punish criminals, in today’s society it is not as effective. The death penalty is such a controversial topic there will never be a correct answer. The arguments are all based on morals and views. Although there is no correct answer, there is a better answer. The human dignity argument gives all humans, equal rights; regardless is one made a criminal mistake or not. All humans have human dignity.

Capital Punishment Essay

J.R.R Tolkien once said, “many that live deserves death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement.” The death penalty should be repealed because it’s very stressful for those involved, it is extremely expensive, and it has convicted innocent people.

One reason why the death penalty should be illegal is because it’s very stressful for those who are involved. According to Berman there were several officials begging for them to change the pace of executions because it imposes stress and trauma (Berman). This proves that carrying out several executions can take a severe toll on correction officers wellbeing. Berman states, “In a state review, authorities wrote that the execution team placed the IV incorrectly and that the officers involved described a feeling of extra stress and urgency because a second execution was scheduled for the same night” (Berman). This also proves that when there’s back to back executions scheduled it can stress the correction officers out and they can get nervous and mess up on something. In “With Lethal Injection Drugs Expiring” Berman states, “‘How can you expect them to do something of this magnitude? It’s rough,’ Givens who executed 62 people and now opposes the death penalty, said Friday. ‘I know the effect it can have on you when you participate in execution… It takes a while to really come out of that” (Berman). This proves that when working as a correction officer and you have to execute people it can be very traumatic and hard to get over which causes stress.

Another reason why the death penalty should be repealed is because it is extremely expensive. According to Jones and Eder, California had spent more than $8 billion on capital punishment since it was reinstated in 1928 (Jones and Eder). This proves that the states are spending billions of dollars just to execute people when that money could be going towards something more beneficial. Jones and Eder states, “The cost of housing a death row inmate outpaces the cost of housing a general-population prisoner by $100,000 a year, primarily because death- row inmates are housed alone instead of two-a-cell, and they require a higher level of security” (Jones and Eder). This proves that the cost of housing just one single death row inmate is very expensive. If housing just one is millions of dollars, than imagine how much money it is when housing multiple. In “Costs Test Backing For Death Penalty” Jones and Eder states, “The Alarcon study concluded jury selection alone in capital cases cost more than $200,000 above the amount for life without parole an that the death penalty prosecutors can cost 20 times as much as life-without parole” (Jones and Eder). This shows that capital cases cost a lot of money and is very expensive. It cost way more than it would cost if it was just life without parole.

Another reason why the death penalty should be repealed is because it kills innocent people. In the article “Time to Question Sanity of Death Penalty” Phillip Holloway states, “A study last year found that, at a conservative estimate, ‘more than 4% of inmates sentenced to death in the united states are probably innocent.’ indeed, there have been 330 executions based on DNA alone” (holloway). This quote proves that over 100 people has been put on death that are innocent. According to Holloway there was this man name Henry McCollum, who was in prison for 30 years on death row for the murder of an 11 year old girl which evidence showed that he did not do. This case proves that some death row cases are unfair and they convict innocent people. His whole life is thrown away over something he didn’t do which is unfair. Holloway states, “Some of the inmates appear to suffer from intellectual impairment and outlining qualms about the legal representation the men have had” (Holloway). People who don’t know better are put to death row, and many of them suffers disabilities and intellectual impairment. Why would you want to kill someone who suffer mental illnesses and doesn’t know better?

Even though many people feel that the death penalty should be abolished, there are many people who support it. People who support the death penalty says it saves lives. According to David Muhlhausen, “Professors Hashem Dezhbakhsh, Paul R. Rubin, and Joanna M. Shepherd of Emory University found that each execution, on average, results in fewer murders” (Muhlhausen). This can be proven wrong because according to Kyle Gibson, prison homicides have increased in the past year from 39 to 55, or a 44% increase (Gibson). People who support the death penalty also argue that it brings justice and closure to the victim’s family. In the article “Death Penalty Brings Relief to Victims’ Family” John Futty states, “She felt comforted to know that he will be put to death” (Futty). Even though many think it will bring closure, it can also bring stress and trauma on others such as those involved. Berman stated, “correction officers described a feeling of extra stress and urgency” (Berman).

Simply by repealing and/or making the death penalty illegal would make America way better. It doesn’t help or do anything to resolve the crime rate. The death penalty is senseless and discriminatory. There’s still crimes going on with the death penalty being legal. It brings nothing but stress, debt, and innocent lives lost.

Was this material helpful?

StudySaurus is run by two uni-students that still get a kick out of learning new things. We hope to share these experiences with you.

Ideas , concepts , tutorials, essay papers – everything we would’ve liked to have known, seen or heard during our high-school & UNI years, we want to bring to YOU.

Privacy & Cookies Policy Terms and Conditions DMCA Request

24/7 writing help on your phone

To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”

How Far Do You Agree with Death Penalty?

Save to my list

Remove from my list

Do you agree or disagree. There is never a reason for death penalty to be used. Both points of view find in argumentative essay examples .

In some countries, serious criminals such as serial murderers and terrorist bomber hardly escape death sentence. While many complement on such tough justice, others condemn it mainly for religious reasons. It appears to me that those who are against the death penalty have failed to notice the more humane aspects behind this seemingly inhumane charge. My essay will look at those humane aspects as against those to the opposite.

First of all, death penalty proves to be an effective ‘kill one to warn all’ approach I law enforcement. Crime rates in China have reportedly been fallen to a certain level since the implementation of death penalty. By nature, whether it has to do with the fear caused by uncertainty of afterlife or not, human beings would be afraid of death. Death sentence, in as sense, is kind of psychological approach to put off the evil flame in mankind.

Proficient in: Death penalty

“ Have been using her for a while and please believe when I tell you, she never fail. Thanks Writer Lyla you are indeed awesome ”

Secondly, some people do deserve this harsh punishment for their wicked act against humanity. A serial murderer who slaughtered dozens of innocent children, a terrorist who launched an attack that killed hundreds—can you figure out a better penalty to resort to for paying the blood these beasts have spilled? Even relatively lighter crime like corruption might result in life long imprisonment, what then, the crime a degree higher like mass murder should be punished with other than ‘an early road to hell’? I just wonder how many people in the world would be willing to spare a terrorist who blasted off 3200 lives in 9.

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

You won’t be charged yet!

Thirdly, death sentence can serve as a means of psychological therapy and mental compensation for the victims and their loved ones. For instance, the Tokyo Trial, which ended up sentencing to death a group of Japanese chief war criminals, is said to provide an efficient psychological relief for those victimized Asian nations during the war.

Death sentence, apparently, is not aimed against morals and ethics, it is, on the contrary, put up to preserve humanitarian codes by assuring the security of the society and the safety of each individual as it can intimidate potential criminals. Considering the matter this way, it becomes evident that death penalty is more of help than harm. Be it psychologically or politically beneficial, it contributes to the maintenance of social order. I, therefore, suggest we be for it.

How Far Do You Agree with Death Penalty?. (2016, Dec 28). Retrieved from http://studymoose.com/how-far-do-you-agree-with-death-penalty-essay

"How Far Do You Agree with Death Penalty?." StudyMoose , 28 Dec 2016, http://studymoose.com/how-far-do-you-agree-with-death-penalty-essay

StudyMoose. (2016). How Far Do You Agree with Death Penalty? . [Online]. Available at: http://studymoose.com/how-far-do-you-agree-with-death-penalty-essay [Accessed: 13 Mar. 2023]

"How Far Do You Agree with Death Penalty?." StudyMoose, Dec 28, 2016. Accessed March 13, 2023. http://studymoose.com/how-far-do-you-agree-with-death-penalty-essay

"How Far Do You Agree with Death Penalty?," StudyMoose , 28-Dec-2016. [Online]. Available: http://studymoose.com/how-far-do-you-agree-with-death-penalty-essay. [Accessed: 13-Mar-2023]

StudyMoose. (2016). How Far Do You Agree with Death Penalty? . [Online]. Available at: http://studymoose.com/how-far-do-you-agree-with-death-penalty-essay [Accessed: 13-Mar-2023]

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

The Essay Writing Experts UK Essay Experts

Disclaimer: This is an example of a student written essay. Click here for sample essays written by our professional writers.

View full disclaimer

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UKEssays.com.

Death Penalty Argumentative Essay

Reference this

If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!

Our academic experts are ready and waiting to assist with any writing project you may have. From simple essay plans, through to full dissertations, you can guarantee we have a service perfectly matched to your needs.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Related Services

Essay Writing Service

Dissertation Writing Service

Student reading and using laptop to study

Assignment Writing Service

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on UKEssays.com then please:

Our academic writing and marking services can help you!

Related Lectures

Study for free with our range of university lectures!

All Available Lectures

Freelance Writing Jobs

Looking for a flexible role? Do you have a 2:1 degree or higher?

Study Resources

Free resources to assist you with your university studies!

Search Support Articles

*You can also browse our support articles here >

Change Region / Country

Here you can choose which regional hub you wish to view, providing you with the most relevant information we have for your specific region. If your specific country is not listed, please select the UK version of the site, as this is best suited to international visitors.

We use cookies to enhance our website for you. Proceed if you agree to this policy or learn more about it.

Example Of Death Penalty Essay

Type of paper: Essay

Topic: Punishment , Criminal Justice , Death , Death Penalty , Crime , Finance , Prison , Life

Words: 1800

Published: 03/25/2020

ORDER PAPER LIKE THIS

Death penalty

The death penalty, or capital punishment as it is commonly known, is one of the issues that have raised controversy not only in the United States, but all over the globe. Undoubted, this subject remains a thorny issue in the world entirely. The United States remains one of the few countries in the world, where the capital punishment is still executed. Whereas some individuals are of the view that this kind of punishment is barbaric in nature and contravenes moral values, others argue that it is a crucial instrument and deterrent in dealing with intended and often violent murder (Berry, 2011). From the legal perspective, death penalty is described as the killing of an individual through a judicial process for vengeance or incapacitation. Ideally, capital punishment is applicable on capital offenses. It is imperative to note that what is considered capital offenses differs from one country to another. There are a number of facts that have been identified challenging death penalty and therefore the reasons as to why it should be abolished. To begin with, execution is an expensive exercise (Scherer, 2006).. According to various studies that have been carried out with regard to the issue of death penalties, research has it that the cost involved in carrying out execution exceeds the cost that could be incurred to keep the person alive in prison. Facts have it that the cost incurred during death penalty trials compared to those of life imprisonment is 20 times more expensive (Scherer, 2006).. With this in mind, every right minded person will be of a similar opinion that death sentences should be abolished in the community since they are very expensive at the cost of the citizens. Families who unfortunately lost their loved ones to murder have confessed that death penalty does not heal their wounds nor do they ease the pain in their hearts. In fact, they confess that the process that has to be undergone before the death penalty is given only prolongs the pains and agony to their families (Scherer, 2006). These families have even suggested that the amount of money the government uses on execution should be used on them to ensure they get proper counselling and restitution which would help them get back to their normal lives. Besides, the perception that the death penalty deters crime is controversial. With regard to the various scientific studies that have been carried out for many years, there have never had any researched that demonstrated that people are deterred to commit crime by executions compared to long life imprisonment. It is worth noting that the rate of murder in countries that do not exercise death penalty have been established to be much lower compared to states that carry out executions (Berry, 2011). There are better ways through which the felon can be dealt with. For instance a sensible alternative is life without Parole. This is because the jurors have an alternative where they are empowered to send the capital murders to prison for life and the possibility of them obtaining a parole is eliminated. It has been established that this kind of a sentence is very much cheap to the tax payer compared to execution and have been proved to keep other intending to be violent offenders away compared to execution. It is worth noting unlike death penalties, life sentences gives room for correction of any mistakes that could have been done along the way (Scherer, 2006). For instance, there are people who are able to prove their innocence after a number of years when more evidence is obtained. These are some of the reasons as to why everyone should consider this society change where death penalties are abolished. Moreover, there are high chances that innocent people will be executed. When an innocent person is convicted and executed bearing in mind that the justice system could not establish his or her innocence, this is one wrong thing that at no one time it will be rectified (Scherer, 2006). In the recent years, there are studies that show men and women have been executed wrongfully within the past two year four people being victims. Such errors are appalling and are unacceptable completely especially where an issue of life and death is being addressed. In addition to that, it have been established that in capital cases there are factor that determine who is to be jailed or not. Among the factors is the race of both the complainant and that of the defendant. A report from a study that was carried out in the recent past in the United States of America has it that the race from which the victim of capital cases comes from greatly influenced the kind of judgement that was reached. That is if someone committed murder to a white the chance of being sentenced to death was 82% high compared to the persons who murdered black. With regard to this, it is apparent that the time for this change in the society has actually come since it makes no sense and has no respect to the basic human rights (Cromie, 2013). Another thing that is worth consideration is the fact that when death penalty is being reached, it is done randomly. Rather than considering the facts that have been presented about the crime, the jurisdiction with regard to where the crime took place as well as the legal counsel quality and not forgetting some politics of the day are the things that determine the final verdict of the bench. This are among the things that make issues with regard to death sentence become a lethal lottery. The facts are clear showing that for around 22,000 cases of homicide reported to have been committed by the end of every year, death penalty is given to 100 or less people (Cromie, 2013). The trends of how the death penalty is implemented show how unfairness is common on the way it is implemented. According to the statistics collected on the date penalty cases, it has been shown that more blacks and Hispanics have been either put on a death sentence or executed, as compared to the whites. For instance, in Indiana, out of the 21 inmates who have been sentenced to death, 17 of them are both Hispanics and Blacks (Isikoff, 2000). It is argued that this is one of the highest percentages of death rows at the state level. Furthermore, during the Clinton era, out of the 175 death penalty cases that were approved, more than three quarters were against minority defendants (Isikoff, 2000). Besides, President Clinton also signed an antiterrorism bill that comprised of a measure that restricted the ability of inmates on state death-row to produce new evidence. This was seen as part of the injustice on death-row inmates, given that there is need for the society to know if the ruling is likely to cost an innocent person his/her life However, various arguments have been put forth in favour of the death penalty. For instance, it is argued that for the society to function effectively, people have to be controlled such that they cannot commit anarchy at will. In addition, there are high chances that murder convicts are likely to commit the same crime in future. As such, such a person who commits murder by extension has shown that he or she does not respect his or her own right to life. Therefore death penalty should not be viewed from a perspective of revenging for the dead it should be viewed from a closure perspective where such a situation is not welcomed again. In addition to that, it should not be viewed from the fairness perspective rather it should be approached from a perspective that we are preventing any future occurrence of a similar event. Felons being supported by tax payer’s money It is important to note that people who escape death sentence are, as a matter of fact, sent for life imprisonment to jail. With this in mind, while in the jail, the felon requires to be supplied with the basic necessities for instance food, clothing among many others for which the government is under an obligation to provide. It is worth considering that the government does not give these necessities to the inmate for free. The government have to get the money from the taxpayers so that they can be in a position to provide the basic necessities (Cromie, 2013). Viewing it from another angle it would be right to say that we are taxed by the government so highly so that the felons who killed our loved ones can be well maintained. It simply sounds as an abuse to the ears of families of such death victims since this is absolutely wrong and this should not happen. If the justice system was fair enough to sentence some of the felon death penalty, the government would save a lot of resources that could be used for the good of the law abiding citizen’s for instance building libraries or other social amenities. Another school of thought is of the opinion that death penalty simply an institutionalised revenge. This is because the justice system turns death penalty to what it is initially meant to be that is a controlled force mechanism with the aim of violence elimination. Unfortunately what the justice system does is that it becomes by itself the system of violence by excising death penalty (Scherer, 2006). Apparently, rather than enabling the society to move from the culture of eye to eye kind of justice, we find that through death penalty it is actually encouraged. In conclusion, it is evident that a time for societal change has come where death penalties are no more. In the paper, an evaluation has been done where both argument for and against has been evaluated and a position that is firmly guided by reasons and fact have been obtained. With all said and done a time for abolishing death penalty has come since they have no advantage that can be attached to it.

Cromie, J., & Zott, L. M. (2013). The death penalty. Detroit, MI: Greenhaven Press. Scherer, L. S. (2006). The death penalty. Detroit: Thomson/Gale. Isikoff, M. (2000). Race, Death, and the Feds. Capital Punishment, Resource Counsel Project. Berry, W.W. (2011) Repudiating Death. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 101, No.2, 441-492.

Cite this page

Share with friends using:

Removal Request

Finished papers: 1971

This paper is created by writer with

ID 265257775

If you want your paper to be:

Well-researched, fact-checked, and accurate

Original, fresh, based on current data

Eloquently written and immaculately formatted

275 words = 1 page double-spaced

Politician Term Papers

Password recovery email has been sent to [email protected]

Use your new password to log in

You are not register!

Short on a deadline?

Don't waste time. Get help with 11% off using code - GETWOWED

No, thanks! I'm fine with missing my deadline

Last Updated 12 Mar 2023

The Benefits of the Death Penalty in America

Abolishing the death penalty allows criminals to receive an easy way out without recompensing their victim. Thirty one out of the fifty states in America obtain the death penalty (“States with and without the Death Penalty,” 2016). An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth displays the biblical morality in allowing the death penalty for those deserving. Thus translating into the greater meaning of why the death penalty should be used.

In America, civilians are protected by ....for their rights to be protected. Americans live in a country where they should feel safe and the death penalty adheres to the protection of each American. Criminals are more likely to commit crimes if there is no severe punishment for doing so. However, if these murderers were sentenced to an execution or a death sentence they would have more fear and potentially avoid doing any harm to anyone. Ernest van den Haag, a professor at Fordham University, wrote about the issue of deterrence:

Order custom essay The Benefits of the Death Penalty in America with free plagiarism report

“...capital punishment is likely to deter more than other punishments because people fear death more than anything else. They fear most death deliberately inflicted by law and scheduled by the courts....Hence, the threat of the death penalty may deter some murderers who otherwise might not have been deterred. And surely the death penalty is the only penalty that could deter prisoners already serving a life sentence and tempted to kill a guard, or offenders about to be arrested and facing a life sentence” (Death Penalty Curricula).

A person who has committed a crime is much more likely to have a relapse and become a repeat offender. According to the National Institute of Justice, “Within three years of release, about two-thirds (67.8 percent) of released prisoners were rearrested. Within five years of release, about three-quarters (76.6 percent) of released prisoners were rearrested. Of those prisoners who were rearrested, more than half (56.7 percent) were arrested by the end of the first year (“Recidivism,” 2014). Therefore, the death penalty act as a deterrent to potential criminals. It greatly influences those who are ready to commit crimes. Capital punishment is a deterrent for future criminals because the only thing that would keep a criminal from committing a crime would be to execute them, in other words the death penalty. Ultimately, the death penalty is effect and should be abolished in any of the states.

In California, there's one ballot initiative to get rid of the death penalty, and one to speed up the process of executions. Due to the seven hundred and forty one individuals on the list awaiting for execution, eliminating the death penalty would give these criminals freedom and nothing to fear. It is important for the death penalty to be there because it will make America a safer place. Speeding up the process of those on the death row would be more beneficial to Americans due to the fact that their death will be faster than they expect. According to the New York Times, “If Proposition 62 is passed, the strongest punishment available under California law would be life without the possibility of parole. Those on death row would see their sentences commuted to life without parole. Attempts to pass a similar measure in 2012 failed.

Proposition 66 takes a different approach by trying to eliminate the obstacles to carrying out the death penalty and shorten the time between conviction and execution. The provisions of the initiative include a five-year limit on the appeals process. If both measures pass, the one receiving the most votes would prevail” (What Else Is on the Ballot? Minimum Wage, Death Penalty and Guns, 2016). California is facing this debate and speeding up the process of the death row would benefit America the most.

The death penalty is not for a teenager who decided to steal a pack of gum, it is for those who commit serious crimes. A serial killer is in fact a deserving candidate for the death penalty. Serial killers generally murder more than two people and enjoy killing these innocent individuals. People like serial killers deserve to be executed and obtain the fear of going through the death penalty. One of the main purposes of the death penalty is to eliminate those who are worthless to America’s “great” society. Eliminating people who have no value in the country and those who only bring harm is important for the United States to succeed as a whole.

There are people who believe that the death penalty kills innocent people. The Grand Jury does not allow this to happen. It is extremely unusual for an innocent person to be sent for the death penalty. The attorneys find ways to provide proper evidence for that person not to be pleaded guilty. A myriad of trials occur before sentencing anyone to the death penalty, it does not occur the next day that person is accused of their crime. In Texas prisoners have spent close to 25 years on death row before being executed. It takes time because there are multiple steps in the appeals process in death penalty cases. And there are multiple steps because it's the ultimate punishment and there's no room for error (Lewis, 2016). The death penalty is a serious topic that can not endure any sort of mistake. With the precautions that the officials have, the death penalty is not dangerous to any innocent individuals.

In conclusion, there are many factors as to why the death penalty is beneficial to America. There are many pros and cons to the death penalty. However, being able to save the life of innocent people who may be victims of a repeat offender outweighs the cons in this debate that takes place within the Criminal Justice System. Eliminating those who have a purpose in America and who could potentially hurt and kill lives of innocent people should endure the death penalty. They have time to reflect on their crimes while being on the death row and will receive the punishment they are deserving of. Ultimately saving lives is what should be valued most.

Works Cited

This essay was written by a fellow student. You can use it as an example when writing your own essay or use it as a source, but you need cite it.

Get professional help and free up your time for more important courses

Did you know that we have over 70,000 essays on 3,000 topics in our database?

Cite this page

Explore how the human body functions as one unit in harmony in order to life

The Benefits of the Death Penalty in America. (2023, Mar 12). Retrieved from https://phdessay.com/the-benefits-of-the-death-penalty-in-america/

Run a free check or have your essay done for you

More related Essays

Didn`t find the right sample?

The Death Penalty “If we fail to execute murderers, and doing so would in fact have deterred other murders, we have allowed the killing of a bunch of innocent victims..

As Americans we live in a modern republic under a government constructed to secure the rights of the people. Today's government and judicial systems were forged by our founding fathers.

Understanding the Death Penalty General Purpose: My general purpose is to give the audience a better understanding of the death penalty. Specific Purpose: My purpose is to inform my audience.

Is Death Penalty ever justified? Capital punishment otherwise, also know as death penalty is a legal process whereby a criminal gets executed as a form of punishment. In the past,.

The Death Penalty is an Outdated Form of Punishment The protective authority is becoming cleverer to stopping crimes and is still increasing for the past years. With the punishment of.

Every day through media streams, we hear news about murders, homicides, and killing. It is hard to spend a day without hearing about these things nowadays. We have our own.

Library Scavenger Hunt Answer the following questions using library or online sources. Respond to each question with one or two complete, correct sentences. Document your sources using MLA documentation guidelines..

The Death Penalty: Right or Wrong? The death penalty is one of the main solutions to prevent crime rates in different states. It should be legalized in all fifty states,.

Death Penalty Persuasive Essay Example

Death penalty persuasive essay introduction.

In the present time, the death penalty is rarely used in society. One supposes that it is an inhuman, immoral, unethical and barbaric way of punishment. However, earlier, when the death penalty had been widespread there were not so many murders. People were afraid to kill, steal or do other illegal actions. It means that the death penalty helped prevent killing. Religion forbids depriving another person of life. When it comes to capital punishment, people's opinions do not coincide. There are those who think that the death penalty is immoral and unethical. They suppose that people cannot decide who should live or die. However, the problems in the criminal justice system of America can be solved through the implementation of capital punishment. It can root out violence and decrease crime rates.

Specify the date when you want your order to be delivered.

Double-spaced papers include 300 words per page; Single-spaced papers include 600 words per page.

Arguments Pros the Death Penalty

People support the death penalty due to an increase in violence and cruelty in the society. There are many cases when murderers kill many individuals intentionally. They are serial maniacs. As a result, they deserve the capital punishment as they commit other violent actions as well. Speaking about the forms of execution in ancient times, one should mention the following fact. They were extremely torturing and violent. One can distinguish such forms of execution: lethal injection, the firing squad, gas chamber, electrocution, and hanging (Anckar, 2014, p. 9).

Serial maniacs and murderers are eligible to receive the death penalty as they kill other people intentionally. They do not regret about their violent actions as cruelty brings pleasure to them. Even after the imprisonment such people if they deserve to be called so continue their criminal activity. The capital punishment can be applied fairly to those whose crime is intentional, shocking and outrageous (Anckar, 2014).

Criminals Deserve Capital Punishment

It is evident that morality is not an argument against capital punishment. The death penalty is justified and moral when it comes to the crimes of larceny, murder, kidnapping, treason, torture, and rape. Such criminals deserve capital punishment as even life imprisonment will not make them follow moral principles. The pardoning of murderers can lead to anarchy and degradation of society. One cannot find moral assumptions in criminal activities. It means that criminal justice should use capital punishment as a way of decreasing violence and promoting some ethical principles (Anckar, 2014). One should analyze the problem of capital punishment from philosophical, cultural, social and political perspectives.

Client's review

" I ordered a cheap essay on this website. Guys, I was so surprised the essay was written better than I thought it'd be. "

Sara J. reviewed EliteWritings on August 15, 2018, via SiteJabber Click to see the original review on an external website.

Political Perspective

Political perspective presupposes constitutionality that defines whether a state should or should not apply the death penalty. It is subjective to think that constitutionality condemns capital punishment. On the contrary, it justifies it as murdering and violent actions being not less cruel than execution. In ancient times, the ways of execution were more torturing and outrageous. Modernization has originated new forms of execution that may not result in pain and suffering. For example, Kentucky offers new methods of the death penalty that are shared by 35 other states. Capital punishment uses innovative and more human ways of punishment (Banner, 2002).

“91% of respondents said politicians support the death penalty in order to appear tough on crime – and 75% said that it distracts legislatures on the state and national level from focusing on real solutions to crime problems” (Death Penalty Information Center, 2015). Old preventive measures (like community works and imprisonment) do not work. That is why the criminal justice system of America seeks innovation and programs that will help decrease the crime rate. The incarcerated population can be divided into lifers (3, 7%) and death row (96%) (Death Penalty Information Center, 2015). If to analyze the data in one prison the percent of incarcerated black people is higher than white ones. 37, 447 is a total number of incarcerated persons; 28, 280 inmates are black people; 9, 094 inmates are white people; and 70 inmates are of other races and ethnicity (Death Penalty Information Center, 2015). The average sentence for adults is the term of 21 years. These statistics prove the racial issue in the criminal justice system of Louisiana (Baze v. Rees, 2008).

The Deterrence Effect of Capital Punishment

One should not generalize speaking about the deterrence effect of capital punishment. The death penalty deters murders and statistics together with the common sense proving this. Firstly, one should say that people are afraid of death. Therefore, fear of death can deter them from murdering or raping. Life imprisonment has less evident influence. The execution brings sufferings and pain and results in death. Consequently, life imprisonment can be a paradise for serial maniacs. One should execute murderers to protect citizens from new murders and guarantee safety to society (Radelet, 1996).

Philosophical Perspective of Capital Punishment

Philosophical perspective refers to feelings and thoughts of people about retribution.

Retribution is inevitable when it comes to criminal justice. As a result, the death penalty is justified to a full extent. Capital punishment is only a way of punishing those who spread cruelty and do not want to follow legislation. It is difficult to build just order in the community. However, capital punishment is one of the ways of improvement (Kayser, 2011). The government cannot constantly feed criminals who have been sentenced to imprisonment. It is unfair when murderers deprive people of their liberties, peace, lives, and worldly good as well as receive the only imprisonment as a punishment. After amnesty, they can continue their illegal activities. One should say that deserved punishment is a way of moral protection of the community. It should be done by means of making an offender pay a price for the crime and restoring the just order. One should not confuse retribution and revenge as they have different motives. Retribution presupposes a just punishment (Soss, Langbein, & Metelko, 2003).

One should say that such irrevocable mistakes in criminal justice are rare. As a result, capital punishment can be justified. It is evident that criminal justice cannot be 100% perfect. Human testimony for proof can cause mistakes that will serve as a way of improvement. Besides, criminal justice should be vigilant to avoid and uncover possible errors. Death penalty cases demand a higher standard to achieve perfection in the system of justice. Small percent in death penalty cases cannot be credible evidence for refusing from it. A risk of making mistakes exists in any sphere (Banner, 2002).

One should not rely on the thoughts of opponents. The cost of the death penalty is high ($2 million per case). However, the life of the criminal who murdered many people cannot be valuable even when it comes to the cost of $1 million for 50 years. Evaluating capital punishment one should take into account the costs spent on imprisonment. Life in prison presupposes costs for food and clothes (Baze v. Rees, 2002).

Cultural Perspective

Race cannot be crucial when one decides upon capital punishment. Indeed, African Americans and Hispanics are charged with capital punishment, according to the committed crimes. The probability of the punishment of innocent African American people is the same as among the whites. The statistics show that African Americans are more likely to commit crimes and offenses. People can be criminals despite their race, social class or ethnicity (Lambert, Clarke, & Lambert, 2004).

Social Perspective

Income level is not the indicator of innocence. For example, in the present time, Louisiana is one of the most dangerous states in the USA. It is evident that problems in the criminal justice system are inevitable. This state occupies the first place, according to the prison incarceration rate. 74.4% are black state prisoners; and 48.3% are white state prisoners (Death Penalty Information Center, 2015). These statistics are alarming and provokes taking juveniles in custody, execution and death sentences. 102, 275 persons are imprisoned on probation and parole (Death Penalty Information Center, 2015). It is the population of Los Angeles. Adults are imprisoned for violent crimes (37.6%), drug crimes (31.8%), and property-related crimes (20.6%) (Death Penalty Information Center, 2015).

Arguments Cons the Death Penalty

Taking into consideration morality, many researchers of law condemn the death penalty as an unethical way of preventing crimes. They suppose that the state and federal governments should not decide whether criminals deserve to die. Capital punishment cannot be an example of moralism and ethical principles of criminal justice (Gudorf, 2013). The legislation concerning the death penalty in America relies on ethnic and racial discrimination. Those who are against capital punishment insist that such a decision is applied more often to poor and innocent rather than guilty and rich. They also suggest that the death penalty is an immoral condition that deprives the person of self-improvement and defense (Eren, 2015).

Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the USA

According to constitutionality, death is a severe punishment for any crime. It is characterized by enormity, finality, pain, and severity. Capital punishment treats people as objects and non-humans who deserve discarding. Persons who are against capital punishment indicate the fatal constitutional infirmity of the death penalty and deprival of common human dignity. The Clause should not regard humans as those who should be subjected to death. In the present time, the Clause forbids capital punishment as an unusual and cruel means of punishment that violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.

The opponents of capital punishment deny its efficacy in decreasing the crimes within the community. They object that the death penalty deters murders and rapes more effectively than life imprisonment. The statistics show that states that use capital punishment do not have lower crime rates than others that have no laws in regard to the death penalty (Eren, 2012). The same situation is with the states that have canceled this punishment. As a result, the death penalty does not provide a deterrence effect. The opponents of capital punishment insist that there is no credible evidence that will prove a decrease in crimes due to the application of the death penalty (Kayser, 2011).

The opponents of capital punishment believe that the cost of death is too high for any crime. Life in prison deprives criminals of a happy and rewarding life. Living in jail presupposes net expenses and taxpaying. However, those who support the death penalty ignore this fact insisting that one should not kill another person to make the community better. Besides, they state that capital punishment demands additional costs. It combines complicated and lengthy capital punishment trials (Shen, 2014).

Now I know that your writers are indeed experts because they know how to carry out research just like my teachers expect me to do. I am thankful to your writers and online agents who always reply to my concerns. Jessica

I used a couple of other services, who only spoiled my grades. EliteWritings.com was like a savior in my life and I gradually improved my reputation. Josh

English writing is definitely not my strongest point and I always make silly mistakes. I surfed the web and found your company. You sent me a good paper with impressive ideas. I really appreciate your help. Anthony

Your writers are really competent and hard working. I’ve purchased a difficult research project and to my surprise – I got excellent! Thanks! Addison

Wonderful writing service and friendly writers who always communicate with customers! I realized that your company can be trusted when you sent me good papers within short deadlines. James

My writer forgot about a part of requirements, but I requested revision and he adjusted the needed part. I got the revised paper shortly and the paper looked just like I was expecting. Lily

I was afraid to buy midterm coursework from you, but I did not know how to deal with my topic in computer sciences. I got 93% for the project and was ecstatic. I will surely use your services more. Logan

I’ve bought some essays from you and you guys are wonderful! Your writers sent me amazing essays! Mia

I did not know about your company and my friend recommended me to order essays from you. Your writer sent me my essays on time and I did not find any mistakes! Abigail

I always forget how to use different citation styles and formatting remains challenging for me. I found out that your company offers cheap formatting services and I sent you the paper. Since that time, my teacher never deducts points for formatting mistakes. Alexander

I am a horrible writer and I would rather pass several tests than work on essays. I found your service and you guys are great! You offered me good discounts and I am pleased to get affordable papers. Cooperation with you is worth it. Zoe

Quick and good service! Olivia

I am so bad in writing that I thought I would fail every class. One of my friends told me to use your services and I could not believe my eyes. Your writers managed to improve my academic records very fast! Thank you. Samantha

I am so lucky! Your essays improved my reputation. Taylor

Death Penalty Persuasive Essay Conclusion

In conclusion, one should say that capital punishment is justified due to the criteria of morality, income level, deterrence, constitutionality, retribution, the cost of death and life in prison, irrevocable mistakes, race, attorney quality, and physicians at executions. One should not doubt the morality of the death penalty as the crimes of larceny, murders, kidnapping, treason, torture, and rapes destroy all ethical principles. The constitutionality makes the death penalty a new form of the execution depriving criminals of pain and suffering. The government saves money spent on imprisonment using capital punishment. Another advantage of the death penalty is deterrence that prevents juveniles from committing crimes. This punishment deters murders and statistics together with the common sense proving this.

Problems in the criminal justice system of America can be solved through the implementation of capital punishment. It is difficult to root out crimes due to their popularity among juveniles. The public correctional policy of the criminal justice system does not work properly as incarceration. It only results in the degradation of humans rather than the prevention of further crimes. The death penalty can be used as deterrence from future crimes. The income level and race are not the most crucial aspects in terms of choosing a proper way of punishment. As a result, those who are in favor of the death penalty have created a stereotypical vision of the death penalty depriving it of any sense and efficacy. However, with the help of capital punishment, the American criminal justice system can be improved.

More About Persuasive Essay Writing

Free Persuasive Essay Examples from Elite Essay Writers

Argumentative, book report, environment, evidence-based practice, informative, please notice.

Some text in the modal.

Home — Essay Samples — Social Issues — Death Penalty — The Death Penalty: Pros and Cons

The Death Penalty: Pros and Cons

Pros and Cons of Death Penalty

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

You have included the three main parts of an essay (introduction, main body, conclusion) backed up with evidence. Spelling, punctation, and grammar are accurate. Well done! A few things to bear in mind for future development: Personal pronouns are not normally used in academic writing. The introduction should begin with ... the broad/wide topic, then mention the parts of the topic that you will be focusing on and end with a thesis statement. The main body points/arguments normally follow the structure of topic sentence, evidence (cited), explanation, and concluding sentence. There are usually 3-5 points/arguments made in the average essay (each in a new paragraph). The conclusion should paraphrase the thesis, summarize the main points/arguments and end with a broad/wide statement about the topic in general. Show more

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student.

Keywords: Capital punishment,Prison,Lethal injection,Crime,Murder,Death penalty Should the death penalty be abolished? Essay on this question can be quite controversial, no matter what side of the argument is chosen. But [...]

The dilemma of whether or not the Death Penalty is ethical is major problem facing society today. The death penalty is given to those who commit crimes deemed by society and government as deserving the infliction of death with [...]

The Death Penalty has been a widely controversial topic in America as it is illegal in 27 of the 50 states in America. Only 21 of the 50 states have been a part of this movement including Texas, Alabama, and more. During the [...]

The Death Penalty has frequently been on the rise lately. In Micheal Cohen’s “Death Penalty should be Abolished now”, he gives some very good valid point on why the Death Penalty should be Abolished. Starting off with one being [...]

Iran leads the death penalty chart, with an incredible number of executions completed in 2011 and the initial ten months of 2012. All around, just China executed more individuals. Iran's per capita execution rate is additionally [...]

Death penalties, also known as capital punishments, are a type of punishment that have been used throughout history to ensure the prevention of further attempted crimes from the convicted criminals. This type of punishment is [...]

The European Convention on Human Rights(ECHR) is an international treaty which was drafted in 1950 in order to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms within Europe. Many countries signed up to this convention including [...]

The Central African Republic (CAR) continues to work towards the capacity of the government in regards to human trafficking. Various aspects such as violent conflict, extreme poverty, strong demand for labor in the informal [...]

Find Free Essays

We provide you with original essay samples, perfect formatting and styling

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

We can help you get a better grade and deliver your task on time!

Free IELTS lessons signup

IELTS band 9 essay: death penalty

Here you can find advice how to structure IELTS essay and IELTS model answer for death penalty topic. Question type: advantages and disadvantages .

Here is the question card:

Some people advocate death penalty for those who committed violent crimes. Others say that capital punishment is unacceptable in contemporary society.

Describe advantages and disadvantages of death penalty and give your opinion.

So this is the advantage/disadvantage essay. In this essay you're asked about :

Before writing this IELTS essay, you should decide what’s your opinion and then choose your arguments to describe pros and cons of death penalty. You don’t have to make up very complicate ideas. Even simple, but well-written arguments can often give you a band 9 for writing .

Some of the possible arguments :

How to structure my answer?

Surely, there are a lot of ways to organise this essay. But here is one possible way of structuring the answer to produce a band 9 essay :

Introduction : rephrase the topic and state your opinion.

Body paragraphs :

Conclusion : sum up the ideas from body paragraphs and briefly give your opinion.

Band 9 essay sample (death penalty)

Many people believe that death penalty is necessary to keep security system efficient in the society. While there are some negative aspects of capital punishment, I agree with the view that without it we will become more vulnerable to violence.

Death penalty can be considered unsuitable punishment for several reasons. The strongest argument is that we have no rights to kill other humans. Right to live is the basic right of any human being, and no one can infringe this right, irrespective of the person’s deeds. Moreover, innocent people can face wrongful execution. Such unfair sentences take away lives of innocent people and make other citizens lose faith in law and justice. And besides, sometimes criminals repent of their acts. In this case they should be given a second chance to improve themselves.

However, I believe that capital punishment is necessary in the society. Firstly, it is an effective deterrent of major crimes. The best method to prevent a person from committing crime is to show the consequences of his or her actions. For example, the government of Pakistan has controlled the rate of terrorism by enforcing death penalties for the members of terrorist organisations. Secondly, the governments spend large sums of national budget on maintenance of prisoners. Instead, this money can be used for the development of the society and welfare of the people.

To sum up, although capital punishment has some disadvantages, I think that it proves to be the best way of controlling criminals, lessening governmental expenses and preventing other people from doing crimes.

(257 words)

Useful vocabulary

capital punishment = death penalty

to commit a crime - to do a crime

deterrent of major crimes - something that prevents big crimes

to face wrongful execution - to be mistaken for a criminal and killed for that

to infringe someone’s right - restrict someone’s right, hurt someone’s interests

innocent people - people who are not guilty or responsible for crimes

to repent of something - to feel sorry for something

right to live is basic right of any human being

unfair sentence - not fair judgement

Support of the Death Penalty Essay

Proposal & annotated bibliography assignment: capital punishment.

Radelet, Michael L, and Traci L Lacock. "Do Executions Lower Homicide Rates?: The Views of Leading Criminologists." Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. 09.02 (2009): 489-508. Print.

Against The Death Penalty Essay

     There are many reasons to both support and oppose the death penalty. Many people can feel very strongly about whether or not they approve of this method of punishment. I feel that the death penalty is wrong, and I believe that there is much support to back this up. I believe that the death penalty is wrong because it is not an effective deterrent, racially and economically bias, unreliable, expensive, and morally wrong of society.

Dylan Pidich. Boston College Philosophy. . "Does The Retributive

“A recent study by Professor Michael Radelet and Traci Lacock of the University of Colorado found that 88% of the nation’s leading criminologists do not believe the death penalty is an effective deterrent to crime. The study, Do Executions Lower Homicide Rates? The Views of Leading Criminologists, published in the Journal of Criminal Law and Crimonology, concluded, “There is overwhelming consensus among America’s top criminologists that the empirical research conducted on the deterrence question fails to support the threat or use of the death penalty.” A previous study in 1996 had come to similar conclusions.”

Victoria Crowley. Soc 153 Debate Essay. April 18, 2017.

For centuries capital punishment has been used to “punish” criminals for a severe enough crime that they committed. It dates back to hundreds of years ago and has been enacted in many different countries, some that still have it today. Death penalty/capital punishment is the punishment of death an offender receives after having a court hearing and being convicted of a crime (ProCon.org, 2008). Once someone receives a death penalty sentence, they go on death row awaiting their execution. For a very long time, the controversy regarding whether or not the death penalty is ethical or just has been a topic of debate. I believe that the

Pro Death Penalty Essay

3 Works Cited

Capital punishment and the practice of the death penalty is an issue that is passionately debated in the United States. Opponents of the death penalty claim that capital punishment is unnecessary since a life sentence accomplishes the same objective. What death penalty opponents neglect to tell you is that convicted murders and child rapists escape from prison every year(List of prison escapes, 2015). As I write this essay, police are searching for two convicted murders who escaped from the Clinton Correctional Facility in Dannemora, New York on June 6th, 2015. The ONLY punishment from which one cannot escape is the death penalty.

The Death Penalty And Its Effects On America

This paper will discuss the Death Penalty. It analyzes the effectiveness of the death penalty. It covers the history of the death penalty as our nation shifts through various eras in its history, as well as the historical background of the death penalty in New York. It considers all factors such as crime rates, deterrence, the rights of the people, and consequences of the death penalty. Analogies were made of areas all over the country as to what degree the death penalty effects crime all around. It concludes this paper by reflecting on the information provided of the death penalty and provide an alternative to it.

Supporters and Oppostion to The Death Penalty Essay

One of the most widely debated and criticized methods of punishment in the United States is the Death Penalty. The Death Penalty is an issue that has the United States quite divided. While there are many supporters of it, there is also a large amount of opposition. Currently, there are thirty-three states in which the death penalty is legal and seventeen states that have abolished it according to the Death Penalty Information Center. There is no question that killing another person is the most atrocious criminal act that one can commit. I am not sure why, but it seems that the United States government is being hypocritical when it says that capital punishment is acceptable because a criminal did murder an innocent victim, and therefore

The Death Penalty Essay

The Death penalty has been a controversial subject since the beginning of time. People are concerned about the morality of the death penalty thus making it a debatable subject. Because of this, James Freeman, columnist for USA Today, decided to write an editorial on the subject of “Does America need the death penalty?” While being a writer for USA Today, one would think that he would effectively use the appeals of rhetoric (ethos, pathos, and logos), but in fact he does not and concludes with a poorly writing argument.

Essay on Pro-Death Penalty

I, as well as many others, have total confidence in the death penalty. It is a very beneficial component of our justice system. The death penalty saves lives. It saves lives because it stops those who murder from ever murdering again. It also deters potential murderers from ever committing the crime.

Deterrence Theory

The death penalty is one of the most controversed punishments in the United States. According to The Death Penalty Information Center, 88% of criminologist do not believe the death penalty is an effective deterrent. According to deterrence theory, criminals are no different from law abiding people. Individuals settle on their choices taking into account the net expenses and advantages of every option. There is a basis provided for analyzing how capital punishment should influence murder rates, according to the deterrence theory. Throughout the years, a few studies have shown a connection in the middle of executions and reductions in homicide rates.

Capital Punishment - A Complex Social Issue Essay

27 Works Cited

Surprisingly, there is one study supported by pro-death groups showing that capital punishment can deter crime up to 35.7%, but here is the catch – the death penalty only deters 35.7% crime for a couple of weeks or months, and the execution has to be widely publicized. (Philips) If this is the case, then one solution to the crime problem in the U.S. could be to have at least one

Deterrent Effect

A common way to determine whether the death penalty had a deterrent effect always on the basis of the number of murders deterred for each convicted criminal that was actually executed (Winter, 2008). The approach to verify the empirical verification was to replicate the results of the original studies and did battery of robustness tests. While the later study showed that these approach failed to confirm the death penalty affects the murder rate.

4 Works Cited

The death penalty is currently used by 34 states and is used by the federal government for punishing federal crimes. And in most cases the death penalty is used when the criminal has been convicted of murder. However, two people have been sentenced to death for the rape of a minor. The definition of the death penalty is: execution of an offender sentenced to death after conviction by a court of law of a criminal offense. This begs the question does the government have the right to take away someone’s life? And if so is it ethical and moral? Overall the goal of the Criminal Justice system is to give the right sentence and protect the people. Even though the death penalty does this, there are better more efficient ways to accomplish that

“Murder is wrong” (“Capital Punishment”). We’ve been taught this indisputable truth since childhood. The death penalty is defined as one human taking the life of another. Coincidentally, that is a classification of murder. There are as many as thirty-six states with the death penalty, and it’s essential that they change it. The United States needs the death penalty abolished because it is filled with flaws, cruel and immoral, and is an ineffective means of deterrent for crime.

Argument Against the Death Penalty Essay

28 Works Cited

Life is sacred. This is an ideal that the majority of people can agree upon to a certain extent. For this reason taking the life of another has always been considered the most deplorable of crimes, one worthy of the harshest available punishment. Thus arises one of the great moral dilemmas of our time. Should taking the life of one who has taken the life of others be considered an available punishment? Is a murderer's life any less sacred than the victim's is? Can capital punishment, the death penalty, execution, legal murder, or whatever a society wishes to call it, be morally justifiable? The underlying question in this issue is if any kind of killing, regardless of reason, can be accepted. In this

Argumentative Essay About Death Penalty

Argumentative Essay: The Death Penalty In Texas

The death penalty has its pros and cons, to take another life or to not. There are thirty-four states that use the death penalty and sixteen states who don’t. Texas is the the top state that practices the death penalty. I support the use the death penalty, not just for “eye for an eye”, (Death penalty procon). I believe in the use of the death penalty only in severe cases. Serial killers, rapist and child molesters I believe cannot function in society, nor will they ever be productive citizens. Capital punishment is away of keeping our society a little safer. The US spends 4% or 49 billion dollars to feed, cloth and entertain murders and rapists. Also “that death penalty cases are estimated to generate roughly $470,000 in additional costs…

Argumentative Essay: The Death Penalty Case In Texas

According to the DPIC (Death penalty information center), the average amount spent on a single death penalty case in Texas is about 2.3million, which is almost three times the amount spent on an inmate put in the highest maximum security for forty years. For crimes that require or call for the death penalty, I support life in prison without parole instead of the death penalty because it is too expensive; cost a lot more than an inmate spending life in prison, does not reduce or deter crime rate,…

Argumentative Essay: Colorado's Death Penalty System

Currently, 18 states have formally declared the death penalty to be illegal. Most states are currently on “hold” or are not aggressively implementing the penalty. Colorado, has shown a growing trend to lack the will for executions. Governor Hickenlooper gave a reprieve in 2013 to our last death row prisoner scheduled to be executed citing the death penalty is a flawed system. Just this year, the new Denver District Attorney, Beth McCann, said her office will not seek the death penalty.…

Argumentative Essay: Is The Death Penalty?

Does the death penalty deter crime, especially murder? Is the death penalty just? Should the death penalty be reformed? The death penalty also known as capital punishment continues to be an issue of controversy for many years. It seems that public opinion on the death penalty has changed over the year and is still changing, but there are still other people who believe that the death penalty is a good punishment and will continue to believe. Most of the time in my life, I often hear “An eye for…

Death Penalty Argumentative Essay

The Death Penalty should not be allowed in any country because of its bad influence. The death penalty has the risk of executing an innocent person. Everyone in death row has the right to a second chance to life. Sometime there is no evidence for execution just because of what they did. Other countries use the death penalty to punish their political opponents. The death penalty is a bad thing for inmates family because it's a reminder of what the government did to their loved one. When put on…

Argumentative Essay: The Death Penalty Debate

Another opposition is that the death penalty is done painlessly and humanely. In Josh Sunburn’s article he gives insight on an example of when a man was killed with cruel and unusual punishment. This mans name was McGuire (41). McGuire was sentenced to death because he kidnapped, raped, and murdered a pregnant girl (Sanburn 41). The time had come for McGuire’s execution and he was strapped on to the gurney and had two IVs on both of his arms (Sanburn 41). The executioners then released the…

Death Penalty Argumentative Analysis

The death penalty is a controversial and heated topic. While some have strong reasons to be in support of it, others have strong reasons to be against it. The reading by Nathanson, the news article I have selected, and the movie Last Dance either implicitly or explicitly give reasons to be against the death penalty. Berns presents an argument in support of the death penalty. I will analyze these sources and consider the multiple perspectives in a critical manner. I will begin by analyzing…

Argumentative Speech On Death Penalty

capital punishment. And my son. Today, I Barbara Teller will inform you all on how the death penalty is just a desperate attempt in search of “justice” blinded by emotions, to prevent other families to go through what I did. You would have thought that throughout the years we would have evolved from this form of punishment that is revenge caked by law, unfortunately not. My son was put to death for the 1992 murder of 70-year-old John Watson of Covington. But no hard evidence had proven he was…

Argumentative Essay: The Death Penalty In America

Caleb Barwick 11 August 2017 Death Equals Peace Should murderers, rapists, and terrorists be let back in society after serving time in jail just to repeat the crimes they already committed? Well, with the death penalty this will not be a problem. With the death penalty that is not possible for that to happen. The death penalty is necessary for punishment because it can help cut down on terrorism, Americans prefer it as punishment, and it is needed for serious crimes. The death penalty is a…

Argumentative Essay: Death Penalty And Deterrence

murder is Death Penalty. Death Penalty and Deterrence Many studies have been conducted to see if imposing death penalty has reduced murders. There have been no conclusive proof that the death penalty had an inverse effect on the murder rates. Although some people believe that sentencing and executing criminals will cause other criminals to think twice before committing a murder, there have been no conclusive proof of this statement. “According to a survey of the former and present presidents…

Ready To Get Started?

IMAGES

Position Paper Sample With Introduction Body And Conclusion / Sample Essay On Drug Testing At
019 Essay Example Death Penalty Pro Against Best Ideas About Persuasive Topics Outline Examples
FREE 16+ Argumentative Writing Samples & Templates in PDF
Death penalty against essay
Against death penalty essay
005 Essay Example Page 1 How To Spend Money Thatsnotus

VIDEO

Death penalty online presentation
MY DAILY LIFE I MY BROTHER NEW CYCLE🤩. my daily life vlogs
Death penalty method from different countries
Task 2 IELTS Writing DEMONSTRATION at Band 9. Agree/Disagree Essay. Sports & Leisure
Why the death penalty should not be legal
Death penalty presentation

COMMENTS

Arguments for and against capital punishment
Contemporary arguments for and against capital punishment fall under three general headings: moral, utilitarian, and practical. Moral arguments Supporters of the death penalty believe that those who commit murder, because they have taken the life of another, have forfeited their own right to life.
Argumentative Essay on Death Penalty
In the article "Death penalty is a deterrence", the authors claims that by practicing the death penalty, violent crimes will decrease. "violent crime has declined 11 percent, with murder showing the largest decline at even more than 22 percent.
Death Penalty Essays
The death penalty is a definitive discipline our general public can give one for their activities and it not all way awful. Then again it is viewed as a disavowal of human rights that advances more prominent savagery in our general public. Strict Resilience.
Death Penalty Essay: Argumentative Essay Sample
The effectiveness of the death penalty can be measured by the rates of crimes that demonstrate that this method of punishment does not reduce the number of criminal acts. The main goal of the death penalty is to decrease the numbers of abhorrent crimes in the world.
The Death Penalty Essay, with Outline
The death penalty is one criminal justice area that has attracted a serious debate about whether or not it should be abolished. The penalty enjoys a strong support from the public as people believe that it serves to deter crime as criminals are afraid of dying just like other humans.
Essay 'Agree or Disagree with the Death Penalty?'
I feel that a death penalty should be placed on a person if they took the lives of innocent people/person for no reason. The reason I am for the death penalty is because if someone murders someone else, they have given up their human rights, including the one to stay alive themselves.
Conclusions about death penalty Free Essays
The death penalty has been a controversial issue for many years. It was established centuries ago and has been accepted by society. It was put into place to punish those who had committed an offense against laws of the institution that was in place at the time. Within our society the death penalty has been associated with several symbols.
Opinion Essay on Death Penalty (Argumentative ...
Individuals who do not agree with the human dignity argument may attempt to argue that the death penalty is an effective consequence because it deters other criminals from committing the crimes. Continuing, it may be argued that the death penalty can show society its moral outrage at unpleasant crimes. Resulting in a decrease in the crime rates.
≡Essays on Death Penalty: Top 10 Examples by GradesFixer
The death penalty is the act of executing somebody as discipline for particular wrongdoing after an appropriate lawful preliminary. It is a definitive discipline. There is no harsher discipline than the death itself. Supportive and counter considerations against the 'moral part' of capital punishment have... Death Penalty Capital Punishment Topics:
How Far Do You Agree with Death Penalty?
1166. Do you agree or disagree. There is never a reason for death penalty to be used. Both points of view find in argumentative essay examples. In some countries, serious criminals such as serial murderers and terrorist bomber hardly escape death sentence. While many complement on such tough justice, others condemn it mainly for religious reasons.
Death Penalty Argumentative Essay
In the article "Death penalty is a deterrence", the authors claims that by practicing the death penalty, violent crimes will decrease. "violent crime has declined 11 percent, with murder showing the largest decline at even more than 22 percent.
Good Death Penalty Argumentative Essays
Arguments FOR the Death Penalty The first and most basic argument is that it is a deterrent and prevents future murderers from committing such heinous crimes. Throughout history, societies have always used different methods of punishment to discourage future criminals from any unlawful action.
Free Essay On Death Penalty
The death penalty, or capital punishment as it is commonly known, is one of the issues that have raised controversy not only in the United States, but all over the globe. Undoubted, this subject remains a thorny issue in the world entirely. The United States remains one of the few countries in the world, where the capital punishment is still ...
The Benefits of the Death Penalty in America
Thirty one out of the fifty states in America obtain the death penalty ("States with and without the Death Penalty," 2016). An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth displays the biblical morality in allowing the death penalty for those deserving. Thus translating into the greater meaning of why the death penalty should be used.
Free Persuasive Essay Example on Death Penalty
Death Penalty Persuasive Essay Conclusion. In conclusion, one should say that capital punishment is justified due to the criteria of morality, income level, deterrence, constitutionality, retribution, the cost of death and life in prison, irrevocable mistakes, race, attorney quality, and physicians at executions. ...
The Death Penalty: Pros and Cons: [Essay Example], 1208 words
The death penalty is an issue that has the United States quite divided. While there are many supporters of it, there is also a large amount of opposition. Currently, there are thirty-one states in which the death penalty is legal and nineteen states that have abolished it. I believe the death penalty should be legal throughout the nation.
IELTS Writing band 9 sample: death penalty
Surely, there are a lot of ways to organise this essay. But here is one possible way of structuring the answer to produce a band 9 essay: Introduction: rephrase the topic and state your opinion. Body paragraphs: paragraph 1: disadvantages of death penalty. paragraph 2: advantages of death penalty. Conclusion: sum up the ideas from body ...
Support of the Death Penalty Essay
In Support of the Death Penalty Introduction From the ethical perspective of philosopher John Rawls who said that justice should be described as" a fair system of arrangements; one that the parties can agree to without knowing how it will benefit them personally" , the death penalty must be considered just and right as it creates a fair balance between the act that has been committed and ...
Argumentative Essay About Death Penalty
Argumentative Essay: Colorado's Death Penalty System. Currently, 18 states have formally declared the death penalty to be illegal. Most states are currently on "hold" or are not aggressively implementing the penalty. Colorado, has shown a growing trend to lack the will for executions. Governor Hickenlooper gave a reprieve in 2013 to our ...